Russell Moore’s Tirade Targets Wrong Youth

In an episode of his podcast, Russell Moore interviewed Senator Ben Sasse regarding how perpetual adolescence hurts the church.

One might immediately snap what’s so wrong with that?

Nothing if by that one is referring to 25 year olds still on their parents’ health insurance as authorized under Obamacare or having never worked a day in their lives by the same age.

However, that is apparently not what this phrase is referring to when articulated by certain professional religionists.

Moore states in the opening of his remarks that, no matter how hard his 16 year old lads work in their grocery store jobs, it is nothing in comparison to Sasse’s own sons bailing hay and birthing cattle.

But doesn’t Moore rank among this contemporary breed of Evangelical that condemns those that would retreat from concentrated areas of population, no doubt going so far as to call “racist” Whites preferring a more reclusive and less urban lifestyle?

Often what these religionists mean when they complain about “perpetual adolescence” is not being married off by the age of 23.

Perhaps Moore and Sasse’s time would have been better spent condemning the perpetual welfare recipients that can’t seem to keep their pants on and their legs together in terms of an unending litany of out of wedlock offspring where as in the case of potato chips many can’t seem to stop at just one.

By Frederick Meekins

Pundit Condemning Capitol Kerfuffle Excuses More Destructive Outbreaks Of Violence

On the 1/10/21 edition of America’s News Headquarters on Fox News, pundit Jessica Tarlov decreed that, if you said that the election was fraudulent, you are complicit with what transpired at the Capitol during the Electoral College vote confirmation.

The only ones guilty of the shocking vandalism are those that perpetrated such acts of violence.

Does Miss Tarlov really want to go the route of criminalizing thought?

For in the very next segment of the interview, Tarlov remarked that the riots earlier in the year occurred for a “very good reason”.

So applying what amounted to a moral categorical imperative just moments prior that those articulating ideological sentiments that those of a less-refined sense of discernment are incapable of distinguishing from those committing crime, should Tarlov be punished for the property and lives destroyed by the likes of Antifa or Black Lives Matter?

At the very least, should she be tossed in terms of her digital personage into a electronic version of the Phantom Zone not unlike President Trump for expressing a viewpoint deemed counter-conducive to what elites are extolling as the rudiments of a stable social order?

By Frederick Meekins

Plague Turns Thoroughgoing Relativists Into Fanatic Absolutists

A public service announcement part of the New York Tough propaganda campaign insists that one does not wear a mask because it is the LAW but because it is the law of nature.

So what if the only reason an individual wears one is to avoid confrontation with the Barney Fife’s of law enforcement and retail security?

If the issue is not about obeying the law but rather philosophical agreement, why the threat of punishment for noncompliance?

Then there is the issue about the laws of nature.

Can it be explained what law of nature prevents a microorganism from floating through a gap in the fabric?

Is similar to a mosquito buzzing through a chain link fence.

It is stated in a PSA that concealing one’s countenance is not so much about preventing the spread of illness but rather about “showing respect”.

At the conclusion, it is revealed that this propaganda is being spewed by the State of New York.

One of the foremost complaints of the sorts that deliberately make that jurisdiction’s primary metropolitan cesspool their place of residence is that the denizens of the much-maligned “fly over country” tend to impose a traditionalist morality upon others.

So if it is acceptable for the Cuomo regime to spread this message beyond the boundaries of the Empire State, perhaps the State of Florida needs to produce a similar spot extolling the virtues of individuality where each person should be allowed to decide for themselves whether or not a mask is the best way to address what we are repeatedly indoctrinated ad nauseam to the point of nausea is a public health crisis.

By Frederick Meekins